15 Comments

Frances,

I have no benefit to lie to you. Cui Bono? No one.

If you sent me something, I would trust you.

We disagree on some points but are both seeking the truth.

Jeff

Expand full comment

Thanks Jeff for your informed understanding of these western oligarch 'Acts of War' against China & your insight into Chinese thinking & perceptions. The 'Acts' are revealed by Gates & others repeated eugenic statements of contempt for humanity as 'overpopulation' as well as western oligarch funding of falsely called 'vaccine' programs which have sterilized, harmed & killed so many in Africa & India, Gates & cronies, now banned from many countries. Now illness & death 'waves', affect mostly those who are mRNA gene-program inoculated. A Taoist & Buddhist refrain is 'What do we know, for sure', reminding us that in our centrally commanded & controlled trickle-down oligarch systems, there is very little, which we can verify. Solving this dilemma, is why all humanity's 'indigenous' (Latin 'self-generating') people traditionally organize locally in ~100 (50-150) person Multihome-Dwelling-Complexes (eg. Longhouse-apartment, Pueblo-townhouse & Kanata-village for loving, intimate, intergenerational, female-male, interdisciplinary, critical-mass, economies-of-scale. Today 70% of people live in Multihomes with an average of 32 dwelling-units = ~100 people for both privacy & proximity. 20% of Multihome-dwellers are extended-families, living intentionally in proximity for social & economic collaboration. On Turtle-Island (N. America) multihome-extended families contribute trillions of dollars annually of the most essential, individually appropriate goods & services to our national economies per year, as our largest essential economy, albeit unrecognized by our oligarch commanded state & institutions. Discussion, sharing, caring, feeding & collaboration in Circular-Economies, among Multihome dwellers, provide these informed populations with the highest innate natural immunity as well as, least likely to get-the-jab. While science's essential 'PEER-REVIEW' is rejected by many mainstream compliant professionals, it is fully embraced by those untitled, often poor multihome human knowledge-keepers. Little discussion is made how the circular-economies of Chinese & such as India's multihome-dweller local sovereignty & economic resilience. Multihomes are exactly how China, India, Africa etc. have been able to conquer the west's bioweapon, not as individuals but as 'community' (Latin 'com' = 'together' + 'munus' = 'gift-or-service'). Those wishing to animate their local Multihome 'economy' (Greek 'oikos' = 'home' + 'namein' = 'care-&-nurture') might wish to collaborate with 'DO-WE-KNOW-WHO-WE-ARE-?' web-based Community-Economy software with: 1) CATALOGUING for local talents, goods, services, resources & dreams, 2) MAPPING complementary abilities for collaboration, 3) ACCOUNTING for buying, selling, investment & collective contribution. 4) COMMUNICATION with Both-sided, Equal-time, Recorded & Published Dialogues for reaching agreement & conflict-resolution. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/structure/9-do-we-know-who-we-are

Expand full comment

Look, I wouldn’t put anything past the USA government at this point, but you are making a lot of assertions here with no evidence to back them up. My mind is open but I make it up for myself once I have seen evidence. If you have some that led to your conclusions, I would appreciate seeing it. You referenced a Harvard study, could you link that perhaps?

Expand full comment

It's on the webpage linked above.

Expand full comment

Le Chat Noir, So Jeff Brown spends many years in China, as well as his daughter further, all with contacts & experience on the ground. Are you looking for some kind of testimony from oligarch owned & operated totally institutionalized detached-from-reality Harvard, which has little clue as to the world it is supposedly studying? in our Topsy-turvy world, 'Hearsay' from good mentors, is the often more accurate source to which collective sources can be an adjunct. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/structure/4-apprenticeship-education

Expand full comment

I don't think I have heard a single theory more wrong than yours.

You talk total nonsense and I am not sure if you have been fed this propaganda by some source in China or whether you genuinely believe this hilarious narrative.

There is NO VIRUS. There never has been a virus.

THERE IS 5G. From Wuhan to Iran to northern Italy in perfect synchronicity with the appearance of the illness.... and so on around the world.

Tell your students in China.

WUAWEI IS ELECTRO-MAGNETICALLY RADIATING THEM.

You need proof?

OK

https://stateofthenation.co/?p=12846

Expand full comment

You should be scared of 5G in the West, because the leaders are psychopaths, who are happy to exterminate their own people, as well as others. The Chinese trust their government, because the leaders trust their citizens. It has not changed in the West for 3,000 years and 5,000 years in China. I am sure that 5G or 1G could be dangerous, if put in evil hands. The Chinese do not have this problem, but Westerners do.

Expand full comment

OK. So why were they the first to get 5G, during the UN Military Games?

Expand full comment

China had 5G long before the Military World Games.

Expand full comment

Wuhan was the first City to activate 5G and that was October 18th 2019. If you think that 5G was activated before that, please produce proof.

Expand full comment

Here is the early history of 5G in China,

First: Shenzhen. It is China's high-tech capital.

#2: Shanghai. It is China's financial capital.

#3: Xiongan. It is China's new political capital south of Beijing. The central government was hooked up for 5G on 2017.4.1. The rest of the city in 2017.8.

#4: Chengdu, Sichuan. They have aerospace.

#5: Lanzhou, Gansu. It represents the western part of China.

#6: Suzhou, Jiangsu. It is part of the big commercial megaplex, including Shanghai, Wuxi, etc.

They don't give the exact dates, but Shenzhen and Shanghai were launched before Xiongan in 2017. We were living in Shenzhen at the time, and I remember the news.

Reference:

中国第一个5g城市试点(我国首个5G覆盖的城市) - 至哲网 https://www.nnzhizhe.com/shenghuo/7186.html

Expand full comment

Why were we told, and are still told, that Wuhan was the first place in China to switch on 5G?

Your link is no use to me. I do not read Chinese and translate is not working for this article.

Expand full comment

I'm not convinced by what the speaker in this video (Jeff Brown?) says either, but it's an interesting hypothesis at least.

One paper linking 5G rollout to the appearance of symptoms dubbed Covid-19 does not convince me that 5G is the sole agent of the disease either, but it's an interesting hypothesis. It flies rather in the face of the mountains of evidence on the development and characterisation on a viral agent, various derivatives or descendants from it, and the mechanisms by which it, and its spike protein in particular, causes all kinds of disease, via, for example, its furin-cleavage site, its prion-like domain, its ACE-2 receptor's affinity for human ACE-2, its HIV motif, and its incorporation of two different snake venoms, but there you go.

The devotion of many people to the no-virus thesis seems to know no bounds and to be immune to all dispute. Can you “prove” that there is no virus? What do you think has been going on in the biolabs in the USA, China, and Ukraine? What do you think patents for viral DNA sequences are all about?

Expand full comment

Alex Livingstone, Good summary on the unknowns between virus & 5-G. I appreciate your starting from your recognition that; we have 'hypotheses', patterns & traces in perhaps terminal period of oligarch imposed human brainwashing, https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/structure/6-holistic-science

Expand full comment

it is not possible to prove a negative, only an idiot would ask for that.

As for what is going on in biolabs. Isn't it obvious?

They are producing toxins to insert into idiots' arms.

No virus has ever been isolated. You know it too. We have conversed before.

Expand full comment