3 Comments

I try to keep an open mind and not see China as a massive threat to Australia and to the world.

Nevertheless, I am aware of CCP funding of 1.2 million Chinese in Australia to buy up arable and residential land. This is clearly invasion and occupation 2022 style; much cheaper than military invasion and withut all the logistical problems. Whatever the dichotomy, it is immensely damaging to young Australians and to food security. It is invasion.

Then there is the mentor relationship of Tedros and the UN's WHO, with very clear CCP control over the incursions into national sovereignty and absolute takeover of national health.

I note the 75% global population now absorbed into the B&R initiative and the panic now setting in, in Sri lanka as the kindly nurturing Sino-hand turns into a stranglehold.

I have previously mentioned other concerns, but there is absolutely no justification for the Chinese militarisation of the Solomon Islands, a move which copies the US imperialism illuminated so famously by John Perkins in his book, "Confessions of a Corporate Hitman".

I now identify Australia's enemies, in order of merit, as the US, China, and NATO.

Expand full comment
author

The United States and Britain overthrew Australia's government. They will do it again, if decided. China never did and never will.

Expand full comment

Well, there you have it.

Absolute refusal by Jeff to confront the evidence. It is all the way with China come what may.

China has also set up a giant iron ore mine in Western Australia, ignoring the FIRB laws. This purely emulates US tactics since WWII. How is this any different to invasion? Our resources are our resources, to mine or not.

And as for your comment "They will do it again, if decided"; in pont of fact, they never left. US/UK power was never relinquished. Australia lost its sovereignty on that day.

So, Jeff, by your rules whatever China does is OK by you. Even the close-down of Shanghai, against a non-threat virus. We have now coined a new phrase: Compulsive Sino-Apologism.

Expand full comment