Denying inconvenient facts about the events of September 11, 2001 has brought us to the brink of nuclear war. By: Enver Masud.
Seek Truth From Facts is your one-stop online resource to be smarter and well-informed, in the face of the West's relentless Judeo-Big Lie Propaganda Machine!
DOWNLOAD FOR FREE!
Denying inconvenient facts about the events of September 11, 2001 has brought us to the brink of nuclear war.
Richard Nixon's Principal Foreign Policy Adviser, deputy director for planning U.S. National Security Council, co-founder Center for Strategic and International Studies, Dr. Robert Dickson Crane wrote that the FREE ebook, 9/11 UNVEILED is the "best short summary of what most Americans and virtually all of the rest of the world consider to be the '9/11 mystery’ (70 pages).”
9/11 UNVEILED and supporting evidence are archived at the International Criminal Court. Available evidence does not support the claim that AA Flight 77 struck the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Debris found at the Pentagon has not been traced to American Airlines Flight 77. Serial Numbers on parts found should have been matched with those in American Airlines logbooks — maintained pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations.
9/11 Unveiled is divided into 10 sections: Attack, Response; Pretexts and Coverups; Bin Laden; The Hijackers; One, Two World Trade Center; 7 World Trade Center; The Achilles Heel; Flight 93; The Pentagon; Boomerang.
The 9/11 Commission Chair Thomas H. Kean and Vice Chair Lee H. Hamilton wrote in their book Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission that they were "setup to fail”. 3000+ American patriots question 9/11.
“The 9/11 Commission Report” was prepared by Professor Philip Zelikow whose expertise includes the creation of myth. Available evidence contradicts Zelikow's narrative. It reads like a novel — not the report of an investigation.
According to the "most influential English language philosopher of the nineteenth century" John Stuart Mill (1806-73):
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion. . . Nor is it enough that he should hear the opinions of adversaries from his own teachers, presented as they state them, and accompanied by what they offer as refutations. He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them . . . he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
Dr. Crane wrote, "9/11 Unveiled . . . [marshals] the hard evidence that must be rebutted to stop conspiracy theories”.
Jack Anderson — "one of the fathers of modern investigative journalism” in the U.S., wrote about me in a nationally syndicated column on September 15, 1990.
I managed the U.S. Department of Energy's National Power Grid Study and National Electric Reliability Study. I’ve worked as an engineering management consultant for the World Bank, EBRD and USAID. I was hired by the U.K. Department for International Development to advise Iraq’s Minister for Electricity. I am a graduate of St. Stephen’s College in Delhi. I've lived and worked in the U.S. since 1960. My father was UNESCO Mission Chief to Indonesia in the 1950s, and India’s ambassador to Saudi Arabia in the 1960s.
Enver Masud
Ashburn, Virginia, USA
Founder, The Wisdom Fund
501(c)(3) corporation
twf.org (est 1995)
---
FREE DOWNLOAD "9/11 UNVEILED” (70 pages)
https://www.twf.org/Library/911Unveiled.pdf
PENTAGON EVIDENCE REBUTS OFFICIAL ACCOUNT
http://www.twf.org/News/Y2010/0911-Pentagon.html
EVIDENCE OF COMPLICITY AND COVERUP
https://www.twf.org/News/Y2012/0815-Evidence.pdf
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
http://www.twf.org/bio/EMasud.html
ABOUT THE BOOK
http://www.twf.org/Library/911Unveiled.html
HARD COPY AT BOOKSTORES
ISBN-13: 9780970001153
190,000+ downloaded/sold (Arabic and Chinese drafts available)
Was 9/11 the "new Pearl Harbor” (PNAC, p.51)?



The cover-up concerning 9-11 appears to be much more comprehensive than would be necessary to protect the jewish role.
.
For example according to Dmitri Khalezov (DK) the pertetrators even took to edit and backdate the content of old dictionaries. DK proved it by showing the genuine content in a private copy of such a dictionary contrasting it with other copies taken from libraries and even 2nd hand bookshops.
.
One such expression was 'Ground Zero' According to DK it exclusively meant the locus of a nuclear explosion while after 2003 it's meaning was expanded to less interesting interpretations. Although it is a very extreme situation DK claims there must have been a wellorganised team in operation and DK was sure this meant the freemasons handled the practical side of the cover-up concerning the dictionaries.
.
DK claims the motive for going through all the trouble was for hiding that 9-11 was carried out with nuclear terrorism not only with conventional explosives.
.
Several different theories have been offered by other interested parties. One such theory is about a nuclear reactor being deliberately going through a melt down from a position underground. It therefore doesnt explode promptly but instead causes an intensive cone of strong radiation weakening the steel skeleton of the building until it collapses. Most likely together with a combination of conventional cutter charges.
.
This explains how strong enough energy would have been available but without causing as strong seismic effects as if it had been a nuclear bomb of that energy.
.
DK also belived Freemasons were involved in organising false wittness accounts about airplanes crashing into the wtc. An obvious advantage with Freemasons for a cover-up is that they are sworn to lojalty with their masonic brethren.
.
I believe that the role of the jews so ubiquitous in history according to anglosaxons like Nesta Webster play their usual role in looking bad but go unpunished because they are working for more powerful masters: The oligarchy.
.
Silverstein probably predicted that he would succeed knowing about his high level protection. Otherwise it would have been much more dangerous for him.
.
This has been going on for 500 years but the anglosaxons are not motivated to expose it since they benefit by redirecting the blame.
.
If the jews weren't willing to play this role they would be less rewarded.
Such jews and their anglosaxon masters are both evil but it isnt the tail wagging the dog.
They are in collusion.
.
And modern zionism and its concomittant Israel project was British from the start despite the selective reading of history practised by most netizens
The much older jewish history played a role in inspiring the British imperialists when they conjured up the imperial plot but it was the british who
talked the court jews into joining it not the other way round.
.
DK's book The Third Truth is very insightful and does a better job than most in explaining many interesting aspects. I disagree about the type of nuclear weapons used but otherwise that book is still among the best. Going deeper than most.
DK was a nuclear security officer in the USSR so he knew about nuclear demolition techniques that were actually included in the approval for wtc in the eraly seventies.
He got such insights partly because the US and USSR had an agreement about using nukes for civilan purposes until 1973